Korea Commits $22.3 Billion to Texas Gas for AI and Leaves $120 Billion Reactor Framework Unsigned
South Korea agreed on Sept. 30 to fund a 6,472-megawatt gas plant for AI in Texas; Brookfield's filing leaves $120 billion of reactors to final negotiation, and energy moves up 0.4.
By Ryan Elliott Dennis · 9 sources · 8 min read
South Korea's government agreed on Sept. 30 to pay the full $22.3 billion cost of Project Star, a 6,472-megawatt gas plant in Encinal, Texas, built to feed artificial intelligence data centers 3. Donald Trump announced the wider package from the Oval Office that day: up to $200 billion of Korean money for American energy 8. NextEra Energy and Related Companies will build and run the plant. Lewis Energy Group supplies the land, the gas and the water 2. The package also names up to $120 billion for eight nuclear reactors. Brookfield, which owns Westinghouse with Cameco, filed that part with the SEC the same day, and its release states the condition flatly: "Terms of the transaction are non-binding and are subject to final negotiations" 1.
So the $200 billion splits in two. Ask four questions of any energy pledge: where is the site, who builds it, who pays, and when does the first turbine run? Project Star answers all four. The reactors answer one and a half, since Korea pays and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick named four states on Sept. 30 5. Today the ledger counts the first part and holds the second for the day it carries signatures.
Korea's $22.3 billion Encinal gas plant lifts the energy reading 0.4 points
The moveThe data5 rows · sources
| Measure | Value |
|---|---|
| Reading before this day | 1.1 |
| This piece's move | +0.4 (Energy, reported) |
| Band for reported evidence | 0.3 to 0.8 |
| Reading after the day (with 6 other pieces that day) | 2.5 |
| Distance to 100 | 97.5 |
Korea's money buys a 6,472-megawatt plant in La Salle County
Project Star is a combined-cycle gas plant, the kind that burns gas in a turbine and then runs the hot exhaust through a steam cycle for more power. Its first phase, 1,952 megawatts of turbines, is scheduled for commercial operation in 2029, and the full plant follows in 2032 3. Seoul Economic Daily reports a three-step schedule: 2029, 2031 and 2032 5.
Who uses the power? The developers name the customer in their own release. At full scale, Project Star will serve "a privately funded 5 GW data center campus that Related Digital is developing on an adjacent site," with the excess sent back to the Texas grid 2. That design follows Texas Governor Greg Abbott's directive that data centers bring their own generation to the ERCOT system, according to the same release 2. It also lists an estimated 8,400 jobs at peak construction and about 170 permanent jobs at the power campus 2.
John Ketchum, chairman and chief executive of NextEra Energy, framed the plant as supply arriving beside demand. "By bringing new generation online to serve new demand, we're helping strengthen reliability, support investment and jobs and protect electricity customers," Ketchum said 2. Read the order of his clauses. New demand leads the sentence, and electricity customers close it, the same group the release says Abbott's directive protects 2. Jeff T. Blau, chief executive of Related Companies, went further: "we are not only bringing our own power and protecting ratepayers, but contributing excess power to the grid" 2.
Korea's industry minister, Kim Jung-kwan, described the purchase in a lender's terms. "We are looking at whether we can recover the principal and interest within the period of the investment," Kim said at a briefing in Seoul, according to The Korea Times 3. He then did the arithmetic out loud. "If you multiply 6.5 gigawatts by $70 or $80, that generates stable cash flow," he said 3. The minister priced the plant by the megawatt-hour. He left the chips, the models and the campus out of the sum entirely.
That is the case for the move. A national government has picked one site, two named builders and a phased date for first power. The power has one stated buyer next door. Korea and the United States also reached a legally binding agreement that caps the strategic investments at $20 billion a year and $200 billion in total, Yonhap reports 4.
Project Star's 6,472 MW plant against the 5 GW AI campus it serves
ComparedBrookfield's filing keeps the reactors in negotiation
The nuclear half reads larger and sits further back. Brookfield's framework covers six Westinghouse AP1000 reactors in three two-unit plants and two Korean APR1400 reactors, all on federal sites 1. About $100 billion of the $120 billion is construction, and $20 billion is a reserve for overruns 3. Lutnick put the figure in one sentence: "It's $100 billion plus a $20 billion contingency to build eight gigantic nuclear power plants" 3.
Brookfield's release ties the reactors to computing as well. "Locating this new generation of reactors on federal sites provides a strategic opportunity to support the buildout of the power and compute infrastructure required to meet growing U.S. energy demand, including from AI," the filing says 1. Connor Teskey, Brookfield's chief executive, said the deal "will mobilize significant capital and accelerate deployment at scale" 1.
Then comes the clause the ledger weighs most. The same filing calls its terms subject to final negotiations 1. Seoul's own account matches it. Korea's industry ministry said the framework "provides only broad guidelines" and that the two countries have yet to agree on specific reactor projects, Yonhap reports 4. Sites, business structures and construction schedules will be set project by project before any final investment decision, according to Seoul Economic Daily 5. Interesting Engineering reported the same gap: each reactor project will need its own commercial assessment and approval 9. The framework itself still awaits signatures from the two governments, Westinghouse, Korea Electric Power Corp. and Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power 3.
Two weeks earlier the record looked different. On Sept. 17, The Korea Herald reported that Seoul sought a 15 to 20 percent stake in Westinghouse, with voting rights and a board seat, while Westinghouse wanted the holding kept below 10 percent 7. The filing now shows 5 to 10 percent 1. Kim gave the reason in plain terms: "The two sides are considering a stake of less than 10 percent, as Westinghouse is not in favor of having Korean companies represented on its board" 4.
Alaska sits furthest back. U.S. officials put Korea's share of the Alaska LNG project above $50 billion, and IBTimes UK reported about $54 billion 58. Seoul calls it a review. "Even if the project has strategic benefits, we have agreed with the U.S. side not to proceed if it is not commercially reasonable," Kim Jung-kwan said 3.
What Korea committed on Sept. 30, and what it left to negotiation
The recordThe data11 rows · sources
| Column | Item | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Committed or legally binding | Korea funds Project Star's full $22.3 billion cost | [3] |
| Committed or legally binding | Related Companies and NextEra Energy build and run the plant | [2] |
| Committed or legally binding | Lewis Energy Group supplies the land, the gas and the water | [2] |
| Committed or legally binding | First 1,952 MW phase scheduled for commercial operation in 2029 | [3] |
| Committed or legally binding | Legally binding cap of $20 billion a year and $200 billion in total | [4] |
| Subject to negotiation or review | Reactor terms subject to final negotiations, Brookfield's filing says | [1] |
| Subject to negotiation or review | Framework awaits signatures from both governments, Westinghouse, KEPCO and KHNP | [3] |
| Subject to negotiation or review | Sites, structures and schedules set project by project before investment decisions | [5] |
| Subject to negotiation or review | Up to $10 billion for long-lead equipment, pending legal approvals | [3] |
| Subject to negotiation or review | Alaska LNG held for a commercial viability review | [5] |
| Subject to negotiation or review | Encinal power purchase agreement expected in 2027 | [3] |
Who buys the power from Encinal?
Here is the strongest reason the step stays small. Project Star's revenue depends on a power purchase agreement, a long contract in which a buyer pays for the plant's output. The Korea Times reports a tolling-style agreement in which data center operators pay a fixed charge for contracted capacity and carry fuel costs, expected to be finalized in 2027 3. As of Sept. 24, that contract was unsigned, and Seoul was still waiting on a U.S. pledge to sign one, Seoul Economic Daily reported 6. On Sept. 17, The Korea Herald reported that Seoul wanted Washington to arrange and guarantee the long-term contracts for a plant that "has yet to secure enough buyers" 7.
Bae Joon-young, a People Power Party lawmaker on the National Assembly's finance committee, sat through the government's closed-door briefing on Sept. 22. "I raised questions about who will buy the electricity, whether the data centers are certain to be built, who will build them and whether they have sufficient capacity," Bae said afterward, in Seoul Economic Daily's translation 6. His list runs from the buyer to the building to the builder. Each item is a fact the release states as a plan.
Kim Sung-won, who chairs the Assembly's trade and industry committee, aimed at the deal's structure. "There is even talk that the structure is shifting so that the United States takes most of the profits while we absorb the losses," he said after meeting Seoul's trade envoy on Sept. 21 6. The final terms answer part of that. Profits split 5 to 5 until Korea recovers its principal and interest across all projects, and only then shift to 1 for Korea and 9 for the United States 3.
Seoul's government expects the Encinal plant to return about $45 billion over 20 years 6. That estimate rests on the buyer Bae asked about. NextEra Energy and Related Companies add a second condition in their own release: the first generators arrive "as early as 2029, subject to required permitting and approvals" 2. A data center campus still in development, a contract due in 2027 and permits still ahead all sit between the announcement and the first megawatt.
NextEra's John Ketchum sees supply for new demand; Bae Joon-young asks who buys
Both sidesThe data2 rows · sources
| Side | Who | Claim | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| For | John Ketchum | Bringing new generation online to serve new demand strengthens reliability, supports investment and jobs, and protects electricity customers. | [2] |
| Against | Bae Joon-young | Who will buy the electricity, whether the data centers are certain to be built, who builds them, and whether they have the capacity all stay open. | [6] |
Where Encinal sits on the ledger
The definition's physical clause asks for ten gigawatts of energized, interconnected compute acting as one machine. Project Star is a power plant, so it moves the energy component and leaves compute where it stands. A 6.47-gigawatt plant serving a 5-gigawatt campus is large against that clause. Its first turbines run in 2029, and its full output arrives in 2032.
Under the method's table, reported evidence earns 0.3 to 0.8 points, and the top of the confirmed band belongs to an energized gigawatt. Encinal has a named payer and named builders, which lifts it above a bare announcement. It still awaits a signed buyer, permits and closed project finance, which holds it near the bottom. Energy moves up 0.4. The $120 billion reactor framework adds 0.0 today, and its first signed site would earn a step of its own.
The ledger counts $22.3 billion of a package worth up to $200 billion
ComparedBy the numbers
- $22.3 billion: Korea's full investment in Project Star, the first project chosen under the package 3
- 6,472 megawatts at Encinal, with a first phase of 1,952 megawatts due in 2029 3
- About 5 gigawatts of data center campus planned beside the plant by Related Digital 2
- Up to $120 billion for eight reactors, including a $20 billion overrun reserve 3
- Six AP1000 units and two APR1400 units, all on federal sites 1
- A Westinghouse stake of 5 to 10 percent for Korea, down from the 15 to 20 percent Seoul sought 17
- Roughly $45 billion that Seoul expects to recover from Encinal over 20 years 6
What to watch
A signed power purchase agreement for Encinal, due in 2027, would confirm the buyer Bae asked about and justify a larger energy step. Texas permits and Related Digital's first data center building are the next physical markers. On the nuclear side, a signed framework, Korea's up to $10 billion order for long-lead equipment by year-end and a first final investment decision would each move the reading 3. A collapse of the buyer talks, or a Korean Assembly vote against the projects, would reverse this step.
Sources
- 1U.S. - Korea Framework Advances Deployment of Westinghouse Nuclear Technology in the United States (Form 8-K, Exhibit 99.1), Brookfield Asset Management, Sept. 30, 2026
- 2The United States Department of Commerce and the Government of the Republic of Korea Announce Strategic Investment in Project Star, a $22.3 billion Energy Infrastructure Campus in Encinal, Texas, PR Newswire, Related Companies, NextEra Energy and Lewis Energy Group, Sept. 30, 2026
- 3Korea, US unveil 3 investments in energy projects, The Korea Times, Lee Gyu-lee, Oct. 1, 2026
- 4Seoul, Washington pick Texas power plant as 1st project under strategic investment, The Korea Times, Yonhap, Oct. 1, 2026
- 5Korea-U.S. Energy Plan Puts $120 Billion Nuclear Push in Four States, Seoul Economic Daily, Lee Jung-hoon, Oct. 1, 2026
- 6Opposition Demands Scrutiny of First U.S. Investment Project, Seoul Economic Daily, Lee Seung-ryung, Sept. 24, 2026
- 7Korea-US $200b investment deal hits nuclear, funding hurdles, The Korea Herald, Jo He-rim, Sept. 17, 2026
- 8Trump Unveils Up to $200bn South Korea Investment Plan Including Eight Large-Scale US Nuclear Power Plants, IBTimes UK, Aiza Moraña, Oct. 1, 2026
- 9Trump unveils Korea-backed $200B US energy plan with 8 reactors, 6.5-GW Texas plant, Interesting Engineering, Neetika Walter, Sept. 30, 2026